Obituary: The United States of America

The Thinker by Rodin

In case you did not notice, the United States of America died on September 28th.

As is often the case with countries long in decline, the actual death went largely unnoticed by the public. The country first tested positive for the righteousness infection in 1981 when President Ronald Reagan was sworn into office. Tests reconfirmed the infection in 1985 and 1989. The infection though went into remission in 1993 with the election of President William Jefferson Clinton. Indeed, some doctors claimed the patient was now free of the disease. However, on January 20, 2001 it became clear that the virus had merely lain dormant for eight years. The disease metastasized on March 20, 2003. From that time on the disease became incurable. Although civil libertarians and liberals made valiant attempts to halt the progress of the disease, the Democrats in Congress refused to develop a spine, saying they did not want to be seen as giving aid and comfort to terrorists.

Death, when it came, came very quickly. The postmortem on the United States of America revealed that death occurred not from one cause, but two principle causes.

First, on this date Congress agreed to do away with writ of Habeas Corpus. Written specifically to ensue those captured in combat could appeal their detention and ignored by the President, Congress said the President could now choose precisely to whom it would apply. The writ has been in widespread use since its first use in 1305 in Great Britain. By the 18th century, the writ was so firmly established that the United States adopted it from the British legal system without a thought. On Thursday after 701 years of use, Congress decided Habeas Corpus was incompatible with fighting the War on Terror. In fact, Congress gave the President so much discretion that he can toss into prison anyone he deems an enemy combatant, including American citizens, and keep them there indefinitely. He does not even have to keep a list of these combatants. Effectively the President now has the sanction to let people he does not like disappear and with no accounting whatsoever. According to our Congress, this shows resolve in the War on Terror. It was noted that at the moment of Congressional passage, the country’s heart stopped beating.

Doctors attempted to revive the country, but were forcibly restrained by the Congress. Congress intervened in the rescue by passing another law that says the United States will comply with the Geneva Conventions by doing precisely what it explicitly prohibits. In doublespeak worthy of Big Brother, Congress declared that the Third Geneva Convention, Article Three which specifically covers treatment of noncombatants, requires them to be treated humanely and prohibits “outrages upon personal dignity, in particular humiliating and degrading treatment” now permits torture. Unbelievably, Congress has interpreted the Geneva Conventions to mean any interrogation techniques that in the judgment of the president does not inflict “severe pain” may be used on noncombatants. Severe pain is defined as any technique that will leave a lasting mental trauma. Although the President is not a psychiatrist, he gets to determine which techniques do not leave a lasting mental trauma. Apparently, waterboarding (simulating drowning) may not leave a lasting trauma. If so, it is lawful and fully complies with the United States’ new interpretation of the Geneva Conventions. Consequently, attempts to restore the country’s heartbeat failed, and the country was declared dead upon passage of these bills. Although the country is dead, the death certificate has not yet been signed. The President is expected to sign both bills into law shortly.

It was noted by many independent observers that the country had been acting delusional since September 11, 2001. Once a beacon of liberty, democracy and concern for the rights of all citizens, the United States became increasingly paranoid and self-righteous. It refused to hear different points of views. Traditional allies who expressed disagreement with its philosophies were either ignored or castigated. Once able to navigate successfully in a pluralistic world, and admired by the rest of the world for its broad tolerance and generosity, it became insular and dogmatic. It counted as friendly only those who followed it without question or hesitation and cast aspersions on any country with differing points of view.

Osama bin Laden was at bedside at the country’s death, and expressed satisfaction. “Frankly,” he said, “we had no idea that such a resilient country with so many constitutional checks and balances could succumb to this infection so quickly. We are delighted to have succeeded beyond our wildest dreams. We have succeeded in killing all the aspects of this country that once was the greatest on the planet. Now the survivors will be more susceptible to our message, since we now share so much more in common. We believe in torture, and so do they. We do not believe in due process or trial by jury, and neither do they. We believe we have the holy truth and so do they. We believe in using whatever means are necessary to affect our ends, and so do they. Frankly, we had no idea that three airliners could kill such a robust democracy so quickly. We look forward to more death and bloodshed in the years ahead. Together we will spread intolerance across the world and bring about a third global war. Praise be to Allah, the Merciful.”

The survivors were too distracted by their cell phones, X Boxes and iPods to notice their country’s passing. They were last seen filling up their SUVs with cheap gas and tuning in the current episode of The Lost.

The Gitmo Scapegoats

The Thinker by Rodin

At Guantanamo Bay in Cuba, we have been housing “detainees”, most of who were captured in Iraq or Afghanistan, for as much as three and a half years. Most were caught in a battle area without a uniform so they were not granted prisoner of war status. Instead, they have been shuffled into a legal limbo for which there appears to be no exit.

Some of these detainees may very well be terrorists. Many claim not to be. However, it does not seem to matter to our government. They have become persona non grata devoid of any rights or privileges, with no right to a trial or even (some allege) a fair hearing. (If it were not bad enough to do this to non-citizens, a court recently affirmed the president’s right to do it to an American citizen during a time of war too.) Since the War on Terrorism promises to last longer than the War on Drugs, these detainees could well spend the rest of their lives in the cells at Gitmo.

Some have reached the breaking point. At least 128 of them are on a hunger strike, and more seem to be joining the ranks every day. Some have been forcibly removed to the infirmary where they are being kept alive through forced feedings. The hunger strike is now on its fifth week. If not for the forced feedings, it is likely that some of these detainees would now be dead.

I do not know how any American, no matter how patriotic, can read these stories and not feel unsettled and deeply disturbed. These detentions may be legal under our bizarrely interpreted rules of engagement, but they are unquestionably inhuman and immoral. The U.N. Declaration of Human Rights, is very clear:

No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment… Everyone has the right to recognition everywhere as a person before the law… Everyone is entitled in full equality to a fair and public hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal, in the determination of his rights and obligations and of any criminal charge against him.

Those guilty of crimes deserve to be punished. Those innocent deserve to be free. Nevertheless, no one, not even someone we suspect to be our worst enemy, deserves to be held in prison forever with their ultimate fate unknown. Basic human decency tells us this is true, and the United Nations, which speaks for all humanity, calls us to account.

Perhaps I would be more accommodating to our president if I had some indication that these men were truly dangerous and bent on destroying America. Who can say? No one seems to be in any rush to bring forth evidence against these men. And naturally our president is wholly indifferent to their fate. He says he is protecting America. If in the process he spoils a few perfectly good apples, well that’s the breaks. Nevertheless, when you read stories like this, then even the most rabidly patriotic among us must have some doubts.

A masked teenager in an Iraqi army uniform walked slowly through a crowd of 400 detainees captured Monday, studying each face and rendering his verdict with a simple hand gesture, like a Roman emperor deciding the fate of gladiators.

A thumb pointed down meant the suspect was not thought to be an insurgent and would be released by U.S. soldiers. A thumb pointed up meant a man would be removed from the concertina wire-encased pen, handcuffed with tape or plastic ties and taken by truck to a military base to be interrogated.

Feeling the heat, the military has decided that some of the detainees can go back to their country, provided their host countries put them in local prisons. Perhaps this is an improvement. The medical care at Gitmo may be better but friends and relatives may come by the prison to say hello. Now these detainees live thousands of miles from what they know as home, cut off from their culture, in a foreign climate, caged, controlled, ceaselessly monitored and conveniently out of the public eye.

About a fourth of the prisoners at Guantanamo have said, “Enough.” Give them a fair hearing or they will choose death. Others allege brutality by the guards and interrogators. Some claim that prisoners are segregated based on how well they cooperate with interrogators. Those in orange jumpsuits are considered uncooperative and they claim are singled out for discipline tantamount to torture.

However, apparently we cannot even give them the dignity of choosing their own permanent exit from their hellish imprisonment. So that we will not bear the stain of their deaths, we will keep them force fed against their will. In their case, we will not even recognize their human right to have control over their own body. In effect, these detainees have been relegated to a legal status of something less than human.

What a sorry and sick situation. I doubt more than a handful of these people are true terrorists. They may have been part of the Taliban and were fighting what they saw as the illegal occupation of their country. That by itself does not mean they terrorized other people. Perhaps some were even affiliated with al Qaeda, but it is unlikely that any one of them directly helped in the attacks on September 11th.

In effect, the detainees at Guantanamo Bay have become our country’s scapegoats. Unable or unwilling to capture Osama bin Laden, we pick people who may be vaguely associated with him instead. I am reminded of William James’s book, The Moral Philosopher where he envisioned:

Millions kept permanently happy on the one simple condition that a certain lost soul on the far-off edge of things should lead a life of lonely torment, what except a specified and independent sort of emotion can it be which would make us immediately feel, even though an impulse arose within us to clutch at the happiness so offered, how hideous a thing would be its enjoyment when deliberately accepted as the fruit of such a bargain?

That is how the situation at Gitmo feels to me. It preys on my conscience. What we are doing there feels deeply evil and wrong, as evil as anything these people would do to us. I wish we had leaders who felt similarly. However, apparently I must be in the minority. Our president does not care. In fact, he feels great about what he is doing, although the evidence suggests it is just encouraging more terrorists to lash out against us. My two Republican senators and my Republican congressional representative do not seem to care. Moreover, for many Americans, anyone in Gitmo is by inference guilty of hating America anyhow, and we are being oh so humane just by keeping them alive.

What this repugnant situation needs is prompt resolution. Military tribunals strike me as reprehensible, but at least it might amount to some sense of closure for these detainees. Being left for forgotten and perpetually in legal limbo is perhaps the cruelest fate we can inflict on anyone. Better to be dead than to be alive but not to live.

I am afraid it will take a new administration and a new congress to change the situation. I hope that when resolution finally arrives there is something resembling human beings left in the inhabitants of these cells at Gitmo. In addition, I hope that whether they are innocent or guilty, when it is all over these detainees will have the strength to forgive us.