<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Occam&#039;s Razor</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.occams-razor.info/comments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.occams-razor.info</link>
	<description>Insightful essays on subjects trivial and profound</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 06:57:01 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on So bad, it’s good … and mesmerizing by Blackbird</title>
		<link>http://www.occams-razor.info/2010/02/so_bad_its_good_and_mesmerizing.html/comment-page-1#comment-6048</link>
		<dc:creator>Blackbird</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 06:57:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.occams-razor.info/?p=2060#comment-6048</guid>
		<description>Actually if you look at the video, there&#039;s a barely-visible watermark that shows that our &quot;wonderful&quot; performance of this song comes from 1976 (wait for his suit to cover that part of the screen so you can see it yourself). By this point the Brezhnev era was going full speed ahead, so it&#039;s perfectly understandable that such a performance would appear...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually if you look at the video, there&#8217;s a barely-visible watermark that shows that our &#8220;wonderful&#8221; performance of this song comes from 1976 (wait for his suit to cover that part of the screen so you can see it yourself). By this point the Brezhnev era was going full speed ahead, so it&#8217;s perfectly understandable that such a performance would appear&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Eulogy for my mother by Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.occams-razor.info/2005/11/eulogy_for_my_mother.html/comment-page-1#comment-6046</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 02:42:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://potomactavern.org/wordpress/?p=435#comment-6046</guid>
		<description>My mother would have been 90 today, had she lived to see it. May she rest in peace.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My mother would have been 90 today, had she lived to see it. May she rest in peace.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Review: Empires of the Sea by Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.occams-razor.info/2010/03/review_empires_of_the_sea.html/comment-page-1#comment-6038</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 15:43:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.occams-razor.info/?p=2073#comment-6038</guid>
		<description>The Christian fleet won the battle, but it is Crowley&#039;s opinion that the quest to control the Mediterranean was ultimately a draw and neither side won. The Venetian fleet had some superior galleys which helped turn the tide in the Christian favor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Christian fleet won the battle, but it is Crowley&#8217;s opinion that the quest to control the Mediterranean was ultimately a draw and neither side won. The Venetian fleet had some superior galleys which helped turn the tide in the Christian favor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Review: Empires of the Sea by Marco Morin</title>
		<link>http://www.occams-razor.info/2010/03/review_empires_of_the_sea.html/comment-page-1#comment-6037</link>
		<dc:creator>Marco Morin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 15:39:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.occams-razor.info/?p=2073#comment-6037</guid>
		<description>I do not agree with the statement that:&quot;Ultimately, no side won.&quot; Lepanto was a victory of the superior western technology that halted for more than a century the barbarian Islamic tide in the Mediterranean Sea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do not agree with the statement that:&#8221;Ultimately, no side won.&#8221; Lepanto was a victory of the superior western technology that halted for more than a century the barbarian Islamic tide in the Mediterranean Sea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Psychiatrists agree: Republicans are insane by John Smtih</title>
		<link>http://www.occams-razor.info/2010/02/psychiatrists_agree_republicans_are_insane.html/comment-page-1#comment-6034</link>
		<dc:creator>John Smtih</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 03:58:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.occams-razor.info/?p=2064#comment-6034</guid>
		<description>Well Mark, at least you&#039;re finally IMHO being honest. The essence of your statement appears to be &quot;I pay for this so if I don&#039;t want to hear opposing views, I don&#039;t have to do so.&quot;

That&#039;s fine, really.  Just please don&#039;t make this blog, or yourself, out to be open minded and welcome diversity of views under the guide that those views are welcome, as long as they agree with yours.

Unless you have an objection, I&#039;ll remain for awhile.  At the beginning of the year, you mused about whether this blog should continue.  If it&#039;s to be a tribute to yourself, yes.  On the other hand, if you can handle legitimate debate and criticism as you appeared, I thought, to want than the answer is probably not.

Just because you pay for &quot;it,&quot; you still place &quot;it&quot; in the public domain.  Otherwise, you&#039;d have a password protected blog with a private subscriber base, wouldn&#039;t you?

I&#039;m just trying to understand what it really is that you want from your readers, Mark?  Explain it, please and if it is agreement only, than I will move on.  I would have thought you&#039;d enjoy the intellectual challenge though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well Mark, at least you&#8217;re finally IMHO being honest. The essence of your statement appears to be &#8220;I pay for this so if I don&#8217;t want to hear opposing views, I don&#8217;t have to do so.&#8221;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s fine, really.  Just please don&#8217;t make this blog, or yourself, out to be open minded and welcome diversity of views under the guide that those views are welcome, as long as they agree with yours.</p>
<p>Unless you have an objection, I&#8217;ll remain for awhile.  At the beginning of the year, you mused about whether this blog should continue.  If it&#8217;s to be a tribute to yourself, yes.  On the other hand, if you can handle legitimate debate and criticism as you appeared, I thought, to want than the answer is probably not.</p>
<p>Just because you pay for &#8220;it,&#8221; you still place &#8220;it&#8221; in the public domain.  Otherwise, you&#8217;d have a password protected blog with a private subscriber base, wouldn&#8217;t you?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m just trying to understand what it really is that you want from your readers, Mark?  Explain it, please and if it is agreement only, than I will move on.  I would have thought you&#8217;d enjoy the intellectual challenge though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on So bad, it’s good … and mesmerizing by Matt Hudson</title>
		<link>http://www.occams-razor.info/2010/02/so_bad_its_good_and_mesmerizing.html/comment-page-1#comment-6032</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Hudson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 20:08:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.occams-razor.info/?p=2060#comment-6032</guid>
		<description>From the Russian Wikipedia, here&#039;s far more than you ever wanted to know about this Soviet Entertainment Icon:

Eduard Anatolyevich Hill
Эдуард Анатольевич Хиль

Soviet Russian pop singer (baritone), Honored Artist of the RSFSR (1968), People&#039;s Artist of the RSFSR (1974). 

Eduard Hill was born on September 4, 1934 in Smolensk, USSR. In 1960 he graduated from the Leningrad Conservatory (class of singing EG Olkhovsky and ZP Lody) and began performing as a soloist of the &quot;Len-Concert&quot;.
 
Eduard Hill is the first to perform the songs &quot;Lumberjacks&quot; and &quot;Moonstone&quot; by Arkady Ostrovsky, and &quot;Song about a friend&quot;, &quot;Blue City&quot;, &quot;But the people go away to the sea&quot; by Andrei Petrov.

Eduard Hill performed such popular songs as: &quot;Of what is the Motherland Founded?&quot;, &quot;Sending off Steamships,&quot; &quot;Blue Cities&quot;, &quot;How Good it is to be a General&quot;, &quot;At the Edge of the forest&quot;, &quot;Birch Sap&quot;, &quot;Sun Ballad &quot;, &quot;What, Tell Me, is Your Name?&quot;, &quot;On Nameless Height&quot;

From 1977-1979, Hill taught solo singing at the Leningrad State Institute of Theater, Music and Cinematography. 
Since 1997, he participates with his son in a joint project with the rock group Prepinaki. 
He worked in Paris at a cafe &quot;Rasputin&quot;. 
The manner Hill’s Performance is unique and easily recognizable, characterized by charm, consistently excellent, bright, sonorous sound, and lilting, lyrical baritone, with a mighty charge of optimism and humor. On stage Hill remains very confident and smart, accompanying his singing with light dance moves and expressive gestures. Never straying from his academic singing style, Hill distinguished himself with enviable stage longevity. According to many critics, Eduard Hill stood as one of the symbols for Leningrad. 
Present place of residence: Tolstoy House in St. Petersburg.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the Russian Wikipedia, here&#8217;s far more than you ever wanted to know about this Soviet Entertainment Icon:</p>
<p>Eduard Anatolyevich Hill<br />
Эдуард Анатольевич Хиль</p>
<p>Soviet Russian pop singer (baritone), Honored Artist of the RSFSR (1968), People&#8217;s Artist of the RSFSR (1974). </p>
<p>Eduard Hill was born on September 4, 1934 in Smolensk, USSR. In 1960 he graduated from the Leningrad Conservatory (class of singing EG Olkhovsky and ZP Lody) and began performing as a soloist of the &#8220;Len-Concert&#8221;.</p>
<p>Eduard Hill is the first to perform the songs &#8220;Lumberjacks&#8221; and &#8220;Moonstone&#8221; by Arkady Ostrovsky, and &#8220;Song about a friend&#8221;, &#8220;Blue City&#8221;, &#8220;But the people go away to the sea&#8221; by Andrei Petrov.</p>
<p>Eduard Hill performed such popular songs as: &#8220;Of what is the Motherland Founded?&#8221;, &#8220;Sending off Steamships,&#8221; &#8220;Blue Cities&#8221;, &#8220;How Good it is to be a General&#8221;, &#8220;At the Edge of the forest&#8221;, &#8220;Birch Sap&#8221;, &#8220;Sun Ballad &#8220;, &#8220;What, Tell Me, is Your Name?&#8221;, &#8220;On Nameless Height&#8221;</p>
<p>From 1977-1979, Hill taught solo singing at the Leningrad State Institute of Theater, Music and Cinematography.<br />
Since 1997, he participates with his son in a joint project with the rock group Prepinaki.<br />
He worked in Paris at a cafe &#8220;Rasputin&#8221;.<br />
The manner Hill’s Performance is unique and easily recognizable, characterized by charm, consistently excellent, bright, sonorous sound, and lilting, lyrical baritone, with a mighty charge of optimism and humor. On stage Hill remains very confident and smart, accompanying his singing with light dance moves and expressive gestures. Never straying from his academic singing style, Hill distinguished himself with enviable stage longevity. According to many critics, Eduard Hill stood as one of the symbols for Leningrad.<br />
Present place of residence: Tolstoy House in St. Petersburg.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on So bad, it’s good … and mesmerizing by Matt Hudson</title>
		<link>http://www.occams-razor.info/2010/02/so_bad_its_good_and_mesmerizing.html/comment-page-1#comment-6031</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Hudson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 16:38:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.occams-razor.info/?p=2060#comment-6031</guid>
		<description>Had I not studied Russian after high school, I would&#039;ve guessed the title to be something like, \Right this way, the deceased in now ready for viewing.\ Cute, extremely cute clip. I&#039;ll try to research this and report back.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Had I not studied Russian after high school, I would&#8217;ve guessed the title to be something like, \Right this way, the deceased in now ready for viewing.\ Cute, extremely cute clip. I&#8217;ll try to research this and report back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Psychiatrists agree: Republicans are insane by Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.occams-razor.info/2010/02/psychiatrists_agree_republicans_are_insane.html/comment-page-1#comment-6029</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 13:41:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.occams-razor.info/?p=2064#comment-6029</guid>
		<description>As I have stated before, this blog like all personal blogs is my sandbox. Since I pay for the site and hold copyright to all the material on the site, this is doubly true. Yes, sometimes I do restate things I said in previous posts. So what? I really don&#039;t care whether you or anyone else finds it annoying at all. If you find what I have to say annoying or repetitious simply move on. That&#039;s the nature of the internet.

Since I will continue to remove comments that don&#039;t meet my subjective criteria and moreover I really don&#039;t care if that annoys you or not, you are probably going remain unhappy. Unless you have some masochistic bent, you might as well stop reading me and hang out somewhere else.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I have stated before, this blog like all personal blogs is my sandbox. Since I pay for the site and hold copyright to all the material on the site, this is doubly true. Yes, sometimes I do restate things I said in previous posts. So what? I really don&#8217;t care whether you or anyone else finds it annoying at all. If you find what I have to say annoying or repetitious simply move on. That&#8217;s the nature of the internet.</p>
<p>Since I will continue to remove comments that don&#8217;t meet my subjective criteria and moreover I really don&#8217;t care if that annoys you or not, you are probably going remain unhappy. Unless you have some masochistic bent, you might as well stop reading me and hang out somewhere else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on So bad, it’s good … and mesmerizing by GuanoLad</title>
		<link>http://www.occams-razor.info/2010/02/so_bad_its_good_and_mesmerizing.html/comment-page-1#comment-6027</link>
		<dc:creator>GuanoLad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 04:17:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.occams-razor.info/?p=2060#comment-6027</guid>
		<description>That pic you link to is Charles Aznavour, not Eduard Hill.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That pic you link to is Charles Aznavour, not Eduard Hill.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Psychiatrists agree: Republicans are insane by John Smtih</title>
		<link>http://www.occams-razor.info/2010/02/psychiatrists_agree_republicans_are_insane.html/comment-page-1#comment-6026</link>
		<dc:creator>John Smtih</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 00:57:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.occams-razor.info/?p=2064#comment-6026</guid>
		<description>&quot;What sillyness?&quot;  Mark, let&#039;s be candid, totally candid, isn&#039;t &quot;repeating yourself,&quot; really what you do, over and over and over again in your blog posts?  Please, think about it because the man in the mirror, I think, is you.

I do think that you have, to a certain extent, censored comments of mine in opposition to your views in the past, so I don&#039;t think you should &quot;resent the implication.&quot;  Either you let respectful opposition comments be published or at least you should, IMHO, be straightforward enough to say that opposing dialogue upsets you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;What sillyness?&#8221;  Mark, let&#8217;s be candid, totally candid, isn&#8217;t &#8220;repeating yourself,&#8221; really what you do, over and over and over again in your blog posts?  Please, think about it because the man in the mirror, I think, is you.</p>
<p>I do think that you have, to a certain extent, censored comments of mine in opposition to your views in the past, so I don&#8217;t think you should &#8220;resent the implication.&#8221;  Either you let respectful opposition comments be published or at least you should, IMHO, be straightforward enough to say that opposing dialogue upsets you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Psychiatrists agree: Republicans are insane by Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.occams-razor.info/2010/02/psychiatrists_agree_republicans_are_insane.html/comment-page-1#comment-6024</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 15:06:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.occams-razor.info/?p=2064#comment-6024</guid>
		<description>We will see what this election cycle brings. Polls are consistent though and approval for Republicans in general are lower than Democrats. Obama&#039;s approval rating is also relatively high compared with other presidents. For example, Reagan&#039;s approval rating dropped to 35% when the unemployment rate hit 10.8%. Americans in general understand that he is trying despite great institutional dynamics to change the way things are.

When people leave comments if they have a web site they can leave the URL, or they can leave it blank. I rarely mess with these URLs unless they point to obviously spam related sites, in which case I delete them and frankly I resent the implication that I would do so systematically. Paranoia on the right sometimes seems to be boundless.

The criteria for comments are quite clear. Having said that I notice that some on the political right get a bit obsessive and will hammer a point home on multiple comments on a particular topic. Once is generally enough. It seems that some feel they cannot be heard unless they have the privilege of repeating themselves over and over again and anything else, even when they are not paying for the web space, is somehow against freedom of expression. What silliness.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We will see what this election cycle brings. Polls are consistent though and approval for Republicans in general are lower than Democrats. Obama&#8217;s approval rating is also relatively high compared with other presidents. For example, Reagan&#8217;s approval rating dropped to 35% when the unemployment rate hit 10.8%. Americans in general understand that he is trying despite great institutional dynamics to change the way things are.</p>
<p>When people leave comments if they have a web site they can leave the URL, or they can leave it blank. I rarely mess with these URLs unless they point to obviously spam related sites, in which case I delete them and frankly I resent the implication that I would do so systematically. Paranoia on the right sometimes seems to be boundless.</p>
<p>The criteria for comments are quite clear. Having said that I notice that some on the political right get a bit obsessive and will hammer a point home on multiple comments on a particular topic. Once is generally enough. It seems that some feel they cannot be heard unless they have the privilege of repeating themselves over and over again and anything else, even when they are not paying for the web space, is somehow against freedom of expression. What silliness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Psychiatrists agree: Republicans are insane by John Smtih</title>
		<link>http://www.occams-razor.info/2010/02/psychiatrists_agree_republicans_are_insane.html/comment-page-1#comment-6023</link>
		<dc:creator>John Smtih</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 06:59:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.occams-razor.info/?p=2064#comment-6023</guid>
		<description>Perhaps my mistake Mark and, if so, I apologize.  It looks like the other highlighted posters are also bloggers while I am not.  If that is indeed the case, I wish to make amends.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps my mistake Mark and, if so, I apologize.  It looks like the other highlighted posters are also bloggers while I am not.  If that is indeed the case, I wish to make amends.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Psychiatrists agree: Republicans are insane by John Smtih</title>
		<link>http://www.occams-razor.info/2010/02/psychiatrists_agree_republicans_are_insane.html/comment-page-1#comment-6021</link>
		<dc:creator>John Smtih</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 06:52:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.occams-razor.info/?p=2064#comment-6021</guid>
		<description>Mark, why is it that other posters names, who I think agree with your opinions are highlighted as links under recent comments, but someone who disagrees with you as I do, finds their names are not?  Is your liberal bias showing?  With respect, is this a blog that only wants to present and hear opinions that agree with it or is it one that welcomes opposing views?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark, why is it that other posters names, who I think agree with your opinions are highlighted as links under recent comments, but someone who disagrees with you as I do, finds their names are not?  Is your liberal bias showing?  With respect, is this a blog that only wants to present and hear opinions that agree with it or is it one that welcomes opposing views?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Psychiatrists agree: Republicans are insane by John Smtih</title>
		<link>http://www.occams-razor.info/2010/02/psychiatrists_agree_republicans_are_insane.html/comment-page-1#comment-6019</link>
		<dc:creator>John Smtih</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 23:45:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.occams-razor.info/?p=2064#comment-6019</guid>
		<description>Republicans are well poised not only to win back the Senate his year but they also have a surprisingly good chance to take back the House.

As for Obama, he&#039;s done.  One term and out will be his legacy.  Whoever is the Republican nominee will be the next POTUS much to the chagrin of liberals such as yourself.

Obama&#039;s broken promise of not accepting federal campaign funds in 2008 will come back to haunt him as smart businessmen and their corporations do what is right for the blue collar working class and put up the money needed to defeat Obama.  If he didn&#039;t have the overwhelming majority of minority voters, he would have lost the last time, regardless of his lying and broken promises on campaign finances.  Now, about all he&#039;s got left are the minorities, true and traditional bleeding heart liberals and gays but the gay community is losing faith in him as well.

Sorry Mark, you&#039;ll be back to full minority status in terms of your politics this year, 2012 and likely for the remainder of your life.

A Senate turnover means Obama will not be able to appoint another Supreme Court justice who is pro-abortion as well.  Roe will be overturned soon after the 2012 election.

Happy Days are here again with common sense about to prevail among the middle and upper classes in this country who work hard and pay the majority of the freight, unlike the career welfarites who have their hands perpetually out, and into, those of us footing the bill for them now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Republicans are well poised not only to win back the Senate his year but they also have a surprisingly good chance to take back the House.</p>
<p>As for Obama, he&#8217;s done.  One term and out will be his legacy.  Whoever is the Republican nominee will be the next POTUS much to the chagrin of liberals such as yourself.</p>
<p>Obama&#8217;s broken promise of not accepting federal campaign funds in 2008 will come back to haunt him as smart businessmen and their corporations do what is right for the blue collar working class and put up the money needed to defeat Obama.  If he didn&#8217;t have the overwhelming majority of minority voters, he would have lost the last time, regardless of his lying and broken promises on campaign finances.  Now, about all he&#8217;s got left are the minorities, true and traditional bleeding heart liberals and gays but the gay community is losing faith in him as well.</p>
<p>Sorry Mark, you&#8217;ll be back to full minority status in terms of your politics this year, 2012 and likely for the remainder of your life.</p>
<p>A Senate turnover means Obama will not be able to appoint another Supreme Court justice who is pro-abortion as well.  Roe will be overturned soon after the 2012 election.</p>
<p>Happy Days are here again with common sense about to prevail among the middle and upper classes in this country who work hard and pay the majority of the freight, unlike the career welfarites who have their hands perpetually out, and into, those of us footing the bill for them now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Craigslist Casual Encounters: now officially a complete waste of time by Liz Doherty</title>
		<link>http://www.occams-razor.info/2009/12/craigslist_casual_encounters_now_officially_a_complete_waste_of_time.html/comment-page-1#comment-6017</link>
		<dc:creator>Liz Doherty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 20:14:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.occams-razor.info/?p=1911#comment-6017</guid>
		<description>I mostly agree with your take on CE and what it has become.  While I can still find sex as easily as before, I am finding that the &quot;good guys&quot; seem to be leaving in droves, and I can&#039;t really blame them.  While I haven&#039;t given up yet, I can certainly understand why the guys would. Sad, but true.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I mostly agree with your take on CE and what it has become.  While I can still find sex as easily as before, I am finding that the &#8220;good guys&#8221; seem to be leaving in droves, and I can&#8217;t really blame them.  While I haven&#8217;t given up yet, I can certainly understand why the guys would. Sad, but true.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
