<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Occam's Razor</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.occams-razor.info/comments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.occams-razor.info</link>
	<description>Insightful essays on subjects trivial and profound</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 00:24:07 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Conservatism’s harvest by Shannon Ahern</title>
		<link>http://www.occams-razor.info/2008/07/conservatisms_harvest.html#comment-1432</link>
		<dc:creator>Shannon Ahern</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 23:02:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.occams-razor.info/?p=856#comment-1432</guid>
		<description>Wonderful piece! I'm going to have my kids read this!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wonderful piece! I&#8217;m going to have my kids read this!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Are people more courteous in blue states? by Stop Signs Save Lives</title>
		<link>http://www.occams-razor.info/2006/01/are_people_more_courteous_in_blue_states.html#comment-1417</link>
		<dc:creator>Stop Signs Save Lives</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 03:55:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://potomactavern.org/wordpress/?p=470#comment-1417</guid>
		<description>It has nothing to do with political leanings. Out here in Western Loudoun, we say "hi" when we pass a person, whether it's on our street or on the trail. We can spot you "city folks" easily as you unsociably bike through head-down or eyes-front, no matter how friendly we are. But the most frustrating situation is the road crossings with huge stop signs for cyclists, including "REQUIRED BY LAW" signs under them. Do you stop? NEVER! Believe me, we don't want you splattered against the side or front of our cars! But some of you are so cocky about flaunting your own safety. And we've even watched you teach your children to only glance at most--never to slow, stop, or heaven forbid, dismount! How in the world can we drive around here daily when we don't know whether you think you are following car rules, bike rules, pedestrian rules, or--as is apparently the case--your own rules (which seem to consist only of "Bikes Rule!")? Last year there were 2 fatal cyclist-car accidents at crossings out here. None of us wants to be the next driver to hit a cyclist, but you all are not doing YOUR part to make us LIKE you being in our neighborhoods and on our streets. So when you bike out here, please say "hi!" and OBEY THE STOP SIGNS. We'll be much happier to see you, and you might just live to become a familiar face on our portion of the trail.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It has nothing to do with political leanings. Out here in Western Loudoun, we say &#8220;hi&#8221; when we pass a person, whether it&#8217;s on our street or on the trail. We can spot you &#8220;city folks&#8221; easily as you unsociably bike through head-down or eyes-front, no matter how friendly we are. But the most frustrating situation is the road crossings with huge stop signs for cyclists, including &#8220;REQUIRED BY LAW&#8221; signs under them. Do you stop? NEVER! Believe me, we don&#8217;t want you splattered against the side or front of our cars! But some of you are so cocky about flaunting your own safety. And we&#8217;ve even watched you teach your children to only glance at most&#8211;never to slow, stop, or heaven forbid, dismount! How in the world can we drive around here daily when we don&#8217;t know whether you think you are following car rules, bike rules, pedestrian rules, or&#8211;as is apparently the case&#8211;your own rules (which seem to consist only of &#8220;Bikes Rule!&#8221;)? Last year there were 2 fatal cyclist-car accidents at crossings out here. None of us wants to be the next driver to hit a cyclist, but you all are not doing YOUR part to make us LIKE you being in our neighborhoods and on our streets. So when you bike out here, please say &#8220;hi!&#8221; and OBEY THE STOP SIGNS. We&#8217;ll be much happier to see you, and you might just live to become a familiar face on our portion of the trail.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Who&#8217;s a strict constructionist? by Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.occams-razor.info/2008/06/whos_a_strict_constructionist.html#comment-1413</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 01:58:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.occams-razor.info/?p=848#comment-1413</guid>
		<description>You should take the time to read the actual decision. Obviously from your comments you have not. I was surprised to find how much explanation of historical context was given.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You should take the time to read the actual decision. Obviously from your comments you have not. I was surprised to find how much explanation of historical context was given.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on It doesn&#8217;t have to happen here by Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.occams-razor.info/2007/04/it_doesnt_have_to_happen_here.html#comment-1412</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 01:29:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://potomactavern.org/wordpress/?p=661#comment-1412</guid>
		<description>By your logic then we would all be much safer if we packed a firearm. The logic of the Wild West though would suggest otherwise.

Europe has very strict gun control laws and homicides caused by guns are very rare. Should we discount their experience?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By your logic then we would all be much safer if we packed a firearm. The logic of the Wild West though would suggest otherwise.</p>
<p>Europe has very strict gun control laws and homicides caused by guns are very rare. Should we discount their experience?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on It doesn&#8217;t have to happen here by Willie</title>
		<link>http://www.occams-razor.info/2007/04/it_doesnt_have_to_happen_here.html#comment-1410</link>
		<dc:creator>Willie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 13:03:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://potomactavern.org/wordpress/?p=661#comment-1410</guid>
		<description>How do you reconcile the fact that most of these mass shootings, like at Virginia Tech, occur in 'gun free' zones? Will you admit that if someone there had had a gun the massacre could have been avoided? That's the weak link of the gun control argument: you're trying to find a gun law that criminals will obey.  By their very nature as criminals, that's not going to happen.  As you yourself said "Firearms make it much, much easier to kill people."  That's true but it's also true that "Firearms make it much, much easier to kill people with firearms who want to kill you."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How do you reconcile the fact that most of these mass shootings, like at Virginia Tech, occur in &#8216;gun free&#8217; zones? Will you admit that if someone there had had a gun the massacre could have been avoided? That&#8217;s the weak link of the gun control argument: you&#8217;re trying to find a gun law that criminals will obey.  By their very nature as criminals, that&#8217;s not going to happen.  As you yourself said &#8220;Firearms make it much, much easier to kill people.&#8221;  That&#8217;s true but it&#8217;s also true that &#8220;Firearms make it much, much easier to kill people with firearms who want to kill you.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on It doesn&#8217;t have to happen here by Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.occams-razor.info/2007/04/it_doesnt_have_to_happen_here.html#comment-1408</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 02:55:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://potomactavern.org/wordpress/?p=661#comment-1408</guid>
		<description>Matt, actually I live in Northern Virginia and have never lived in Washington, D.C. My father was raised there, however. To the best of my knowledge no one in his family owned a gun (they lived in a row house), nor on my mother's side (she was a resident of Bay City, Michigan). As for myself, my formative years were principally in and around Endwell, New York in a rather typical suburban neighborhood. I am sure some of my neighbors had guns and some were hunters. However, I never saw any of my neighbors with guns, so it was largely an unknown experience for me.

The dynamics of oil prices will move us to live closer together. It makes sense that the more people are in each other's faces, the more likely they are to have conflicts. Adding guns to the mixture raises the likelihood they will be use. The Supreme Court granted us the freedom to have guns. If history is any guide, they will cause a lot of homicides. A few will be burglars, but the vast majority will be people we know and get into an argument with and let escalate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt, actually I live in Northern Virginia and have never lived in Washington, D.C. My father was raised there, however. To the best of my knowledge no one in his family owned a gun (they lived in a row house), nor on my mother&#8217;s side (she was a resident of Bay City, Michigan). As for myself, my formative years were principally in and around Endwell, New York in a rather typical suburban neighborhood. I am sure some of my neighbors had guns and some were hunters. However, I never saw any of my neighbors with guns, so it was largely an unknown experience for me.</p>
<p>The dynamics of oil prices will move us to live closer together. It makes sense that the more people are in each other&#8217;s faces, the more likely they are to have conflicts. Adding guns to the mixture raises the likelihood they will be use. The Supreme Court granted us the freedom to have guns. If history is any guide, they will cause a lot of homicides. A few will be burglars, but the vast majority will be people we know and get into an argument with and let escalate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on It doesn&#8217;t have to happen here by Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.occams-razor.info/2007/04/it_doesnt_have_to_happen_here.html#comment-1407</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 18:24:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://potomactavern.org/wordpress/?p=661#comment-1407</guid>
		<description>I visited your web site today to see what you may have posted about the recent supreme court ruling on handguns in DC.  

It led me to review the conversation you and I had about gun control after the shooting rampage at Virginia Tech.  It was an enjoyable experience to review your points and mine.  :)  It was interesting to apply our respective thoughts against some of the points made regarding the Supreme Court decision.   As expected, our respective point of view and recommendations cannot solve the situation now any more than it could a year ago.

Two key points about our discussion came to mind:

1.  One thing we did not discuss is the difference in upbringing and perspective from a person like me raised in rural Pennsylvania and someone (maybe like yourself) raised in the big city like DC.  The more I debate the issue with people the more I realize how much of an impact your place of origin has and, as important, whether you were raised with guns in the house or not.  In simplest terms, people who were raised with a gun(s) in the house tend to see it perfectly natural to possess one.  Those who didn't find it dangerous, offensive, unnecessary, and the root cause to violence and death related to handguns. 

I have guns (two rifles, two shotguns, and one handgun). I own a concealed weapon permit but rarely carry.  Due to my inherent non-violent nature I am a very low risk to use my handgun to kill someone.

On the other hand (and please forgive the stereotyping) a black 17 year old male raised in a poor black neighborhood where crime and violence are common is going to behave in an evil manor for his own gain using whatever means possible.  Yes, I acknowledge that the ease of access to a deadly weapon such as a handgun makes the 17 year old's opportunities to kill much easier.  But in this example the inherent nature of the male and his intentions are the cause of the problem not the tool that he (and his gang members) choose to use to enforce their wishes.

We are not going to solve the violent nature of these cultures by removing handguns.  They will be violent without them, and kill without them.  Even if every state were to create a law which makes it illegal to buy and possess a firearm it would not solve the problem.  Criminals would either acquire handguns illegal (as I suspect they do every day) or find an alternative method to assert their will.

On a related note, I support thorough background checks and waiting periods for firearms.  And I have a tough time understanding why someone needs a rocket launcher or an AK-47.  But, the rocket launcher is rarely in the news where it was used to kill another human being in civilized areas (non-war zones).

2.  I TOTALLY agree with your point about the effects of increasing population density.  I purposefully purchased a piece of property (2 acres) to provide a cushion between myself and my neighbors (whom I happen to get along with quite well). When I look at subdivisions with 3500+ sq ft houses and 20 feet separating one house from another, I cringe.  Human beings are not intended to live in those conditions...not without consequences that we read about in the papers everyday.

As always, thanks for "insightful" articles.  They are much more interesting to read than CNN or MSBC.  ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I visited your web site today to see what you may have posted about the recent supreme court ruling on handguns in DC.  </p>
<p>It led me to review the conversation you and I had about gun control after the shooting rampage at Virginia Tech.  It was an enjoyable experience to review your points and mine.  <img src='http://www.occams-razor.info/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  It was interesting to apply our respective thoughts against some of the points made regarding the Supreme Court decision.   As expected, our respective point of view and recommendations cannot solve the situation now any more than it could a year ago.</p>
<p>Two key points about our discussion came to mind:</p>
<p>1.  One thing we did not discuss is the difference in upbringing and perspective from a person like me raised in rural Pennsylvania and someone (maybe like yourself) raised in the big city like DC.  The more I debate the issue with people the more I realize how much of an impact your place of origin has and, as important, whether you were raised with guns in the house or not.  In simplest terms, people who were raised with a gun(s) in the house tend to see it perfectly natural to possess one.  Those who didn&#8217;t find it dangerous, offensive, unnecessary, and the root cause to violence and death related to handguns. </p>
<p>I have guns (two rifles, two shotguns, and one handgun). I own a concealed weapon permit but rarely carry.  Due to my inherent non-violent nature I am a very low risk to use my handgun to kill someone.</p>
<p>On the other hand (and please forgive the stereotyping) a black 17 year old male raised in a poor black neighborhood where crime and violence are common is going to behave in an evil manor for his own gain using whatever means possible.  Yes, I acknowledge that the ease of access to a deadly weapon such as a handgun makes the 17 year old&#8217;s opportunities to kill much easier.  But in this example the inherent nature of the male and his intentions are the cause of the problem not the tool that he (and his gang members) choose to use to enforce their wishes.</p>
<p>We are not going to solve the violent nature of these cultures by removing handguns.  They will be violent without them, and kill without them.  Even if every state were to create a law which makes it illegal to buy and possess a firearm it would not solve the problem.  Criminals would either acquire handguns illegal (as I suspect they do every day) or find an alternative method to assert their will.</p>
<p>On a related note, I support thorough background checks and waiting periods for firearms.  And I have a tough time understanding why someone needs a rocket launcher or an AK-47.  But, the rocket launcher is rarely in the news where it was used to kill another human being in civilized areas (non-war zones).</p>
<p>2.  I TOTALLY agree with your point about the effects of increasing population density.  I purposefully purchased a piece of property (2 acres) to provide a cushion between myself and my neighbors (whom I happen to get along with quite well). When I look at subdivisions with 3500+ sq ft houses and 20 feet separating one house from another, I cringe.  Human beings are not intended to live in those conditions&#8230;not without consequences that we read about in the papers everyday.</p>
<p>As always, thanks for &#8220;insightful&#8221; articles.  They are much more interesting to read than CNN or MSBC.  <img src='http://www.occams-razor.info/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Indistinguishable from magic by Justin Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.occams-razor.info/2008/06/indistinguishable_from_magic.html#comment-1406</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 13:29:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.occams-razor.info/?p=847#comment-1406</guid>
		<description>If you think the portable GPS systems are magic, you should see what they're doing with the glass-panel cockpit displays for airplanes.  Garmin is a leading supplier of integrated cockpit systems and has a dual LCD screen setup called G1000 that replaces analog flight instruments and includes a large-screen GPS navigation panel similar to the portable devices.  The main difference being that it know all about airports (and their radio frequencies and ground taxi-way diagrams), terrain, obstacles, as well as major roads and other landmarks visible from the air.  They've even integrated XM sattelite weather into the system so you can see near real-time weather radar right on the screen.

They're now taking it a step further and actually rendering terrain, obstacles, and flight paths into the flight control display.  If you're flying in less-than-visual conditions (clouds, etc), you would normally rely on ground-based radio navigation.  Their newest creation basically turns the flight control display into a video game that just happens to be hooked up to the airplane.  Now that's magic!

See: http://www.aopa.org/pilot/firstlook/080408garminsvs.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you think the portable GPS systems are magic, you should see what they&#8217;re doing with the glass-panel cockpit displays for airplanes.  Garmin is a leading supplier of integrated cockpit systems and has a dual LCD screen setup called G1000 that replaces analog flight instruments and includes a large-screen GPS navigation panel similar to the portable devices.  The main difference being that it know all about airports (and their radio frequencies and ground taxi-way diagrams), terrain, obstacles, as well as major roads and other landmarks visible from the air.  They&#8217;ve even integrated XM sattelite weather into the system so you can see near real-time weather radar right on the screen.</p>
<p>They&#8217;re now taking it a step further and actually rendering terrain, obstacles, and flight paths into the flight control display.  If you&#8217;re flying in less-than-visual conditions (clouds, etc), you would normally rely on ground-based radio navigation.  Their newest creation basically turns the flight control display into a video game that just happens to be hooked up to the airplane.  Now that&#8217;s magic!</p>
<p>See: <a href="http://www.aopa.org/pilot/firstlook/080408garminsvs.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.aopa.org/pilot/firstlook/080408garminsvs.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on You Porn: A Traveler&#8217;s New Best Friend? by Jarl2000</title>
		<link>http://www.occams-razor.info/2007/10/you_porn_a_travelers_new_best_friend.html#comment-1399</link>
		<dc:creator>Jarl2000</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 12:10:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://potomactavern.org/wordpress/2007/10/you_porn_a_travelers_new_best_friend.html#comment-1399</guid>
		<description>Yeah paysites are going down, no doubt about it. Personally my favourite 2.0 pornsite is &lt;a href="http://www.assbear.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;assbear.com&lt;/a&gt;. It's totally ad-free and has a list of other tubes, which i think is really cool. 
Ps: great article!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah paysites are going down, no doubt about it. Personally my favourite 2.0 pornsite is <a href="http://www.assbear.com" rel="nofollow">assbear.com</a>. It&#8217;s totally ad-free and has a list of other tubes, which i think is really cool.<br />
Ps: great article!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Id Unleashed at Craigslist&#8217;s Casual Encounters by Random</title>
		<link>http://www.occams-razor.info/2005/12/the_id_unleashed_at_craigslists_casual_encounters.html#comment-1301</link>
		<dc:creator>Random</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 12:46:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://potomactavern.org/wordpress/?p=457#comment-1301</guid>
		<description>On Dec 27th, 2005, in "The Id Unleashed at Craigslist’s Casual Encounters," you write:

"It is achingly low tech and unpretentious. It seems to be inhabited by contributors who cannot bothered to spell check or use mixed case."

Read again and again until you can't be bothered any more about windmills.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Dec 27th, 2005, in &#8220;The Id Unleashed at Craigslist’s Casual Encounters,&#8221; you write:</p>
<p>&#8220;It is achingly low tech and unpretentious. It seems to be inhabited by contributors who cannot bothered to spell check or use mixed case.&#8221;</p>
<p>Read again and again until you can&#8217;t be bothered any more about windmills.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
