<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Review: Star Trek (2009)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.occams-razor.info/2009/05/review_star_trek_2009.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.occams-razor.info/2009/05/review_star_trek_2009.html</link>
	<description>Insightful essays on subjects trivial and profound</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 11:07:34 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.occams-razor.info/2009/05/review_star_trek_2009.html/comment-page-1#comment-2388</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 18:33:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.occams-razor.info/?p=1437#comment-2388</guid>
		<description>Nimoy looks dreadfully old though. Then again, I am getting there, being 52.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nimoy looks dreadfully old though. Then again, I am getting there, being 52.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gil</title>
		<link>http://www.occams-razor.info/2009/05/review_star_trek_2009.html/comment-page-1#comment-2387</link>
		<dc:creator>Gil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 17:29:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.occams-razor.info/?p=1437#comment-2387</guid>
		<description>I never considered myself a Trekkie, but more or less a casual viewer of the original series and as a kid had the occasional Star Trek toy in my room. My knowledge of the complex world of Star Trek is basic at best, but enough to not get lost. This movie appealed to me in every way possible and can&#039;t wait to see it again.

As soon as Nimoy appeared, everyone in the theater gave him a round of applause out of respect. As you mentioned, his appearance alone was enough, but yet did not overshadow the newer cast members. I also thought Zachary Quinto did a remarkable job as Spock.

While we did get a more-in depth and somewhat even proverbial glimpse of the characters in this film, Uhura still remains a mystery to me and always will. 

An interesting tidbit I just learned was that Jack Lord was considered for the role of Kirk, but turned down by Roddenberry. 

Excellent review and great blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I never considered myself a Trekkie, but more or less a casual viewer of the original series and as a kid had the occasional Star Trek toy in my room. My knowledge of the complex world of Star Trek is basic at best, but enough to not get lost. This movie appealed to me in every way possible and can&#8217;t wait to see it again.</p>
<p>As soon as Nimoy appeared, everyone in the theater gave him a round of applause out of respect. As you mentioned, his appearance alone was enough, but yet did not overshadow the newer cast members. I also thought Zachary Quinto did a remarkable job as Spock.</p>
<p>While we did get a more-in depth and somewhat even proverbial glimpse of the characters in this film, Uhura still remains a mystery to me and always will. </p>
<p>An interesting tidbit I just learned was that Jack Lord was considered for the role of Kirk, but turned down by Roddenberry. </p>
<p>Excellent review and great blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nomad</title>
		<link>http://www.occams-razor.info/2009/05/review_star_trek_2009.html/comment-page-1#comment-2386</link>
		<dc:creator>Nomad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2009 08:18:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.occams-razor.info/?p=1437#comment-2386</guid>
		<description>I absolutely loved all the characters except for the new Spock -- i liked the original stoic version more than the new condescending version</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I absolutely loved all the characters except for the new Spock &#8212; i liked the original stoic version more than the new condescending version</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
